The research gap
Removal does not necessarily mean exit.
Children exploited through criminal activities may be identified,
removed from immediate danger and recognised as victims while
remaining exposed to the functions and conditions that can make
re-recruitment, re-exploitation or renewed dependence possible.
Under what conditions does separation from forced criminality become a sustainable exit for children and adolescents, and through which mechanisms is that durability produced, weakened or reversed?
CHILD-EXIT does not claim that the general idea of sustainable exit is new.
Its specific contribution is to formalise a child-focused, longitudinal and
falsifiable research architecture linking protective separation, functional
replacement, identity transition, social recognition and reincorporation,
ecological and institutional continuity, and sustainability over time.